|Quote (lucky13 @ Dec. 11 2007,09:40)|
DSL isn't about eyecandy, it's about function.
|Quote (lucky13 @ Dec. 11 2007,07:20)|
Is it necessary to leave some of those other fs modules in the base? How many people need Mac (hfs/hfs+) and BeOS (befs) filesystem support, and can't they be accomodated via module extensions? If we don't have the progs to take advantage of the modules, why retain them?
|I have tried to accomodate the cristism of the icons, when sized down for JWM menu, by using these new more square looking icons.|